2018 Ross Eadie

Mynarski

Ross Eadie

Mynarski Ward

Social Media links for Candidate

Links to Candidates Website and Email

Candidate's Website (None)Candidate's email

About the Candidate

Incumbent since 2010.

Ross Eadie is a 'dog-friendly' candidate who supports dedicated funding for off-leash areas and the 'single-use' designation. See his comments below.

Platform: Not published.

Eadie has lived, gone to school, worked, and participated in many community activities and organizations through out the North End and West Kildonan for over fifty years. He served as city councillor from 2010 to 2018 and as a trustee in the Seven Oaks School Division from 2002 to 2006.

Eadie spent many years as a volunteer advocate on many issues, including making city services and infrastructure accessible.

Eadie earned a diploma in business administration from Red River College diploma, graduating with top honours as the 1990 Lieutenant Governor's Medal winner and later starting two businesses.

Q1: If elected, will you put forward and/or support a motion in Council to create a dedicated tax-supported capital fund for the creation of new dog parks and the upgrading of existing ones to comply with standards in the City of Winnipeg’s new Off-Leash Area Master Plan? Why or why not?

Yes dog park creation and improvement would be part of the following commitment:

Improving Parks and Recreation

Our parks, leisure, recreation, and youth sport makes the North End, West Kildonan and Winnipeg a better place to live. This infrastructure is just as important as roads and bridges. There is a dire need to renew and improve our parks and recreation facilities!

“Similar to road renewal programs, I will be advocating for park and recreation/sport facilities renewal and improvement programs to deal with our deteriorating parks and recreation facilities.”

Q2: If elected, will you put forward and/or support a motion to designate off-leash areas as “single-use” parks where only those activities associated with off-leash dogs are permitted? Why or why not?

I have no problem with this designated use, but I believe as I voted that the master plan already allows for this single-use perspective. It seems to me that there will be consultations on dog park provisions when a variety of options are possible including single use. In some of our dog parks, there fences missing which should be covered by provisions in my answer to question one.